|


| |
Edward I and his Parliaments
|
Edward I investing his son as
Prince of Wales |
| |
The
Crisis of 1297-1298
 |
Philip IV of France attacked the main English possession in France,
Gascony in 1294. Wales revolted in 1294-95 and there was war in Scotland in
1296-97. Edward had to respond militarily to all these threats and war
was expensive.
|
 |
Edward I was financing his wars in Gascony
with loans from the Italian bankers Riccardi of Lucca (who
incidentally were also lending money to Philip IV of France at the
same time.) This source of money collapsed when Edward and Philip both
confiscated their assets (Philip also imprisoned their representatives.) |
|
Italian bankers of the 1300s |
|
 |
|
 |
Philip IV also came into conflict with Boniface VIII over lay taxation
of the clergy.
As part of the dispute, in
1296 Boniface
VIII issued the bull Clericis Laicos, forbidding
clergy to pay taxes to civil authorities. It also interfered with
Edward I's war finances.
|
 |
Edward tried various ways to maintain the campaign in France,
including pressing the nobility into military service and seizing the
England's wool exports. These measures met with stubborn opposition.
|
 |
By
1297, Edward I was unpopular and his subjects on the point of revolt.
While he was absent in Flanders, Edward's advisors backed off. They
withdrew the heavy customs dues - Edward had increased the duty on
wool six fold - confirmed Magna Carta, and agreed not to levy new
taxes without consent of the realm.
|
The Rise of Parliament
|
Parliament c. 1400 |
 |
 |
From the earliest times, the kings of England had assembled nobles and
other important subjects to advise them. The Anglo-Saxon
witan or witanagemot is named as endorsing the laws of
King Ine and King Alfred amongst others.
|
 |
The Norman and Angevin kings also called "small councils" of their
immediate advisors, and "great councils" of all the major barons,
churchmen and government officials.
|
 |
Simon de Montfort summoned assemblies that included not only bishops
and noblemen but also knights of the shire and burgesses from the
towns. De Montfort's appeal to the wider community of the realm was
continued by Henry III and Edward I.
|
 |
The transition from the king's council to parliament as such was
gradual and does not seem to have been very important to
contemporaries (although later historians have debated at length the
precise composition and origins of parliament in the 13th Century.)
|
"The
significance of parliament lay not so much in the particular
acts as in the concentration of them in a formal and public
occasion. These periodical stock-takings were expressions of
the cohesion between king, prelates, barons, ministers of
state, judges and, when they were represented, the local
communities."
(Powicke, The Thirteenth Century) |
|
 |
Edward I sometimes summoned only the nobility to his councils, but
increasingly during the 1300s the representatives of the shires and
towns were also called. Members of the lower clergy were also sent for
on occasion.
The "Model Parliament" (1295) contained councilors, bishops, abbots,
priors, proctors chosen by the lower clergy, barons, burgesses and
knights.
|
 |
Parliament was useful for endorsing laws (statutes; acts of parliament), considering
important legal decisions, and approving taxation.
| The most important business of the
Lent Parliament of 1305 was the ordinance of trailbaston.
This was aimed especially against highwaymen and other violent
criminals. The king had ample authority to institute such
measures without parliament, but its endorsement gave it added
force. |

Medieval muggers |
|
 |
The role of Parliament in voting taxation grew in importance. Strong
kings like Edward were not in particular need of the political support
offered by the community of the realm, but did need the financial
support (especially for war) that it afforded.
|

Acton Burnell Castle,
site of Parliament in 1283. |
Parliament was not yet settled at Westminster,
nor did it have fixed terms. It met when and where the king
wanted it.
In 1283, for example, when Edward I was in the Welsh Borders
pursuing his campaigns against Wales, Parliament was summoned
there. |
|
 |
The early parliaments of Edward I also differed from later ones in
that the firm division of two houses - Lords and Commons - had not yet
been institutionalized.
(In the 1295 Model Parliament, for example, the clergy met separately
from the nobility and the knights, and they met separately from the burgesses.)
In the course of the fourteenth century the Lords (now including bishops and
abbots as well as secular nobles) and Commons (knights and burgesses) began
regularly deliberate as
two distinct bodies.
|

|
Nobles were summoned by writs under the Great
Seal to attend parliament, but it was only established in the
course of the 14th and early 15th centuries exactly which
noblemen had a right to sit. |
|
 |
Parliament became primarily a lay assembly. Bishops and abbots (as
feudal tenants) continued to sit in the Lords, but from 1283 the
lesser clergy were represented in Convocation (first in the Province of
Canterbury; then also at York) where the bishops also sat (in the "Upper
House.") Representatives of the lesser clergy ceased to go to parliament in the
course of the 1300s.
|
 |
From its earliest sessions, the representatives of the counties and
towns were empowered to make decisions without referring back to their
communities. This made Parliament a powerful and flexible body for
deciding policy.
|
 |
In England (unlike on the Continent), nobles paid taxes just as
commoners did. The most powerful and prosperous landowners in the
country therefore had an interest in keeping the burden of taxation
low, and the English lower classes never suffered such oppressive
taxation as their European counterparts.
|
 |
From its earliest days, parliament was an institution that both
voted taxes and redressed the grievances of subjects:
English kings had to ensure at least a minimum level of contentment in
exchange for consent to taxation.
|


|