351-08:
|

The drawing lesson, Jan Steen |
The Dutch Republic in the
early seventeenth century
|
Society and economy
 | The United Provinces was a
small, prosperous, highly urbanized country. The state tolerated
many different religions. |
 | The Dutch had large merchant and shipping fleets. In 1670, about ten per cent of Dutch adult males were sailors; - the Dutch
had more ships than England, France, Germany, Portugal, Scotland,
and Spain combined.
| Dutch
fishermen caught vast quantities of herring, particularly in the
North Sea fishing grounds. On purpose-built ships called buizen
("busses") the fish were gutted, salted and barreled. Other faster
ships - ventjagers ("sale-hunters") - sailed out to meet the
buizen, so that the catch could be transferred and delivered
to market quickly while the large, slow buizen returned
to the fishing ground to catch still more fish. |

|
|
 | There was continual
friction between the Dutch and British, because the Dutch built
ships more cheaply, then fished in British waters and delivered
their wares to ports more efficiently. Privateers sailing from
Dunkirk attacked Dutch fishing ships, but it was only when war with
France and England in the second half of the seventeenth century
destroyed their markets that the Dutch fishing trade declined. |
 | Dutch vessels were very important in the carrying trade. Western
Europe's major source of timber was the wooded southern shore of the
Baltic - the most important port being Danzig. Dutch vessels moved
almost all the timber in the seventeenth century, but the English
were also concerned in the trade. Both the Dutch and the English
depended on Baltic timber for shipbuilding, and the wars and
diplomacy with Sweden and Denmark revolved around these countries'
need to guarantee freedom of timber supplies through the
Baltic Sound. |
 | The Dutch exploited the the wind-powered saw-mill (invented
1596) to turn timber into lumber more efficiently than their rivals. |
 | The Dutch built ships more cheaply, more quickly and better than
did any of their rivals.
|
The Dutch fluyts could carry more
freight with less crew, and so their rates were two-thirds or half
those of England (the closest rival). Only in the long-haul trade to
the East Indies and the New World (where the large, unarmed fluyt
could not be used) could the English carriers compete. |
So efficient was Dutch shipbuilding that France, Sweden, and Denmark
had their warships built there.
|
 | Dutch ships also carried exports of cloth manufactured in the
Netherlands (Leiden and Amsterdam were the largest centers).
| Dutch
religious tolerance attracted skilled workers, many of whom came to
work in the new draperies - light cloths that increasingly
replaced expensive high-quality woolen cloth. |
 |
|
 | Until the middle of the seventeenth century, Dutch ships were
also major carriers of grain from the plains of Poland. The decline
after this date was due to increased agricultural production in
Western Europe. The Dutch were at the forefront of this "agricultural
revolution". |
 | Dutch agricultural output had increased in part because of land
reclamation. During the first half of the seventeenth century, the
Dutch drained large areas of land.
|
|
The
dikes were earthen walls, sometimes reinforced with wood, and covered
with grass. The "polder mills" were used to pump surplus water from
low lying fields. Maintenance of these extensive systems required
community effort and helped the Dutch become the best hydraulic
engineers of the day. |
|
[The story of the the little Dutch
boy putting his fist in the dike to prevent a flood was invented by a
romantic nineteenth-century American authoress and has no foundation
either in truth or in Dutch folklore.]
 |
The Netherlands were also at the forefront of
agricultural innovation. Instead of periodically leaving land fallow, the Dutch
rotated crops (turnips, peas, and clover alternating with grain). This
enabled them to sustain high levels of production without exhausting
the land. Alternation of "fodder crops" with grain also allowed the
farmer to keep more livestock and use their manure to fertilize the
land, so winning both ways. Despite its highly efficient agriculture,
the Netherlands still had to import some grain, so densely was it
populated. |
 |
By excluding the Dutch from Spanish and
Portuguese ports, the Spanish crown forced the Dutch to exploit new
sources of raw materials and discover new markets for their goods. The
Dutch sold Polish grain directly to the Ottoman Empire, and traded
profitably in the Caribbean and South America. |
 |
Another necessity that the Dutch turned into a
virtue was the shortage of land. In other Western European countries
the wealthy bought large estates, but unable to do this, the Dutch
invested in trade, insurance, and banking.
The Dutch founded two important trading companies: - the Dutch East
India Company (1602), and the Dutch West India Company (1621). The
East India Company commenced with a capital of 6 1/2 million florins
in 1602, and rapidly instituted a system whereby contributors could
not withdraw capital but could trade their shares freely. In practice,
only the large investors decided where and how the Company should
trade. Tea, coffee, and spices were its most important commodities.
The Dutch West India Company almost immediately came into conflict
with Spain. It captured Bahia (Brazil) in 1625 but lost the colony
almost immediately. Continual warfare consumed most of its profits
from the trade in slaves, sugar, gold, and ivory. The chief source of
the West India Company's dividends was raiding Spanish shipping; in
1628, the year that Piet Heyn seized the Spanish treasure fleet, the
Company paid a dividend of 50%. |
|
The Great
Tulip Mania, 1636-37
Not all Dutch
investment was solid and sensible. Tulips were introduced from
Ottoman Turkey and grown in the Netherlands during the early
seventeenth century. The beautiful flowers served as an
extravagant display of wealth and taste for prosperous Dutch
burghers. Suddenly in 1634-35, there was an explosion in demand
and prices soared. Particularly rare and beautiful bulbs fetched
thousands of florins, and speculators invested in "tulip
futures" - buying the flowers before they had even grown in the
fields. The speculative bubble burst abruptly; prices began to
fall and investors were left holding worthless assets bought
with borrowed money.
To restore some sort of stability, a government commission
finally ruled that any contract could be terminated by paying
3.5% of the purchase price. |
 |
There was some poverty in the Netherlands despite
its overall prosperity, but the Netherlands
did have a system of civic poor relief and charitable institutions
that was the envy of Europe. The old, the insane, the sick, disabled,
and orphans were all supported and put to useful work wherever
possible. The system was - of course - also one of social control and
its dependents were given religious instruction and subjected to
discipline. Nevertheless, perhaps as many of ten per cent of the
larger cities' inhabitants benefited directly from the system.
| Rembrandt, Beggars receiving
alms (1648) |
 |
|
 |
To maintain local order, Dutch towns raised civic
militias from the ranks of the modestly wealthy (shopkeepers, lumber
dealers). Militia officers were often closely related to local
government officials. The Civic militias were not usually of any
political importance, but in 1672 their decision to side with the
populace and against those members of the elite willing to capitulate
to France, was crucial. |
 |
The government of Dutch towns was drawn from a
small rich elite. The vroedschap (city council) and regents were
usually selected from the richest merchants. As the century
progressed, investment income grew to be more important than direct
profits from trade for many powerful families. |
Government
 |
The
government of the United Provinces was decentralized. Each province
controlled its own internal affairs. Within each province the towns
were also largely self-governing. Only foreign policy, the army and
some religious matters were controlled by the provinces jointly. |
 |
Holland
was the richest and most powerful province. It was ruled by the States
of Holland, a body composed of the delegates of eighteen towns; a
delegation of the nobility also had a vote.
 |
Amsterdam was the richest town in Holland and played a dominant role
in the States. |
The States met four times a year, but there was a permanent official
known as the Pensionary. (Until 1618 he was known as the
Advocate). Because the Pensionary formulated and implemented
policies (as well as resolving disputes between the various delegates)
he became very influential. This was especially true because although
the Pensionary was theoretically elected for five years, in practice
he was tenured for life.
|
Important
Pensionaries (Advocates) of Holland
Jan van Oldenbarnevelt
1586-1618
John de Witt 1653-1672
Caspar Fagel 1672-1688
Antonie Heinsius 1689-1720 |
|
| "[In
Holland] a merchant oligarchy, closely tied by maritime trade
and based in a compact region, controlled government for the
province, and more often than not for the entire Republic…
Perhaps only in Holland and a few other commercial centers does
Marx's observation about the state being a committee for the
common affairs of the bourgeoisie really square with political
realities" (Downing). |
 |
Each province also appointed a stadholder
- a lieutenant to supervise public order and justice. From the
earliest days of the United Provinces, this office (and very often
that of the Captain-General of the army) was held in most provinces by
a member of the Orange Family. The House of Orange was the only one
holding the title of "Prince" and William the Silent (assassinated
1584) was widely regarded as the father of the nation because of his
heroic role in the struggle against the Spanish.
 |
|
[Not all offspring and marriages are shown] |
|
 |
The power of the stadholder tended to be
greater in time of war than of peace, and the "Orangist" faction was
therefore the war faction. William II
tried to unite the army, orthodox Calvinists, hawkish merchants and
the anti-Spanish populace in a bid to increase the stadholder's
power. His main opposition lay in Holland where the oligarchy wanted
the peace, toleration, and weak government so conducive to profitable
trade. His son, William III,
later made a more discrete attempt along similar lines when the French
had become the threatening power. Neither attempt was wholly successful - the balance of power between stadholder and
Holland's regents was always an issue during the seventeenth century.
|
|