J.P.SOMMERVILLE
Custom, common law and constitutionalism |
|
367 - 4 (4) |
"The first thing
we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
(Henry VI.ii, 4.2) |
|
In much of Continental Europe, the laws were based on those inherited from the Roman Empire, i.e. Roman (or Civil) Law. In every country, the laws had been altered and adapted in response to local customs and circumstances. The French legal theorists Jacques Cujas (1520-90) and Francis Duaren (François Douaren) (1509-99) even argued that custom was the supreme form of law. | |
|
However, it was in England that custom played the most important role in shaping law. The English system of Common Law was relatively unaffected by Roman Law - in England, law was not codified, but determined by judges on the basis of earlier decisions (precedent) and custom. | |
|
Common lawyers were important in English society -
they made up a large proportion of those sitting in the House of Commons. Sir
Edward Coke and many other common lawyers shared a political ideology
based on the notion that ancient custom (as interpreted by common
lawyers) was superior to the king and to all other forms of law. | |
|
Common law thinking was a largely conservative ideology
designed to protect the status quo from the intrusion of government
and was as opposed to doctrines of popular sovereignty as to those of royal
absolutism. The conservative theorist,
Edmund Burke (1729-97) preserved many of the elements of common
law thought when he lauded the "wisdom of our ancestors," expressed
"no very exalted opinion of the virtue of paper government," and
insisted that "to innovate is not to reform." |

Sir John Popham (1531-1607)
Lord Chief Justice of the Queen's (later King's) Bench from 1592
|
Sir John Fortescue was Chief Justice of the King's Bench from 1442. He sided with Henry VI in the Wars of the Roses and when Henry was defeated and deposed, Sir John fled abroad. | ||
While in exile in France, Sir John Fortescue wrote De laudibus legum Angliae and The Governance of England, a work that compared English and French society and government. | ||
|
Fortescue asserted that the English form of government - because it was a "regimen politicum et regale" (i.e. a constitutional monarchy) - was superior to foreign forms of monarchy such as the French. Because taxation and legislation required the people's consent in England, the whole population was free and prosperous. People were motivated to defend the country from foreign foes and to take civic responsibilities, like jury service, seriously. Jurors, being prosperous free farmers, could not easily be bribed. In France, by contrast, the jury system would not work, because the downtrodden French peasantry could easily be bribed or overawed by wealthy lords. | ||
|
Fortescue took many ideas from Saint Thomas Aquinas and from Leonardo Bruni (1369-1444), but his stress on the excellence of the English constitution was his own. | ||
Despite or because of the fact that Fortescue saw
contemporary England through rose-colored glasses and trashed the
French unfairly, his work was immensely influential.
|
|
Sir John Davies was not only a legal theorist, a Member of Parliament, and Solicitor General for Ireland, but a distinguished poet. | |
|
Davies introduction to his Irish Law Reports provided a classic expression of the the common law outlook. | |
|
Unlike Sir Edward Coke, Davies believed that the king had many extra-legal prerogatives (i.e. emergency powers) - it was simply that English monarchs had the sense and moderation only rarely to exercise them. | |
|
Another lawyer who took a very high view of the royal prerogative was Sir Francis Bacon. Bacon was an advocate of law reform, but was more concerned to advance scientific knowledge. |
Sir Edward Coke
|
![]() |
|
"For a man’s house is his castle, et domus sua cuique tutissimum
refugium"[and his home his safest
refuge].
"Magna Carta is such a fellow that he will have no sovereign." (another and perhaps more accurate version has "no saving," but since he was discussing a proposal to make a "saving" or exception to Magna Carta in favor of the king's sovereign power, the difference in sense is slight). |
|
The most important of the common law theorists was Sir Edward Coke. He was widely recognized by contemporaries as the greatest living lawyer. Related by marriage to the William and Robert Cecil, he was steadily promoted, becoming Solicitor General in 1592, Attorney General in 1593, and Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas in 1606; in 1613 he was transferred to the Chief Justiceship of the King's Bench, which was technically a promotion but meant a drop in salary.. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Coke pronounced on a series of cases of great constitutional importance
| ||||||||||||||||
|
Coke's frequent opposition and general audacity exasperated James, who believed that the King's Chief Justices should share the King's interests, and in 1616 he dismissed Coke from the judiciary. Coke continued to oppose many crown policies - he was imprisoned after the Parliament of 1621, and took a major part in drawing up the Petition of Right. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Yet Coke was extremely ambitious, and tried to regain royal favor by forcing his daughter into marriage with Sir John Villers (brother of the royal favorite George Villiers (later Duke of Buckingham). He never regained his post as Chief Justice, though he was intermittently readmitted as an advisor; after 1621 he fell altogether from royal favor. | ||||||||||||||||
|
Coke's writings were generally regarded as
authoritative both by contemporaries and later lawyers and
constitutional theorists in England and America. |
|
|
Common law theory |
|
Common Law was essentially time-honored
customs. Even
Magna Carta was viewed as a
codification and confirmation of earlier customs rather than original
legislation. | ||
|
Yet common law was also essentially rational. Its defenders insisted that common law reflected essentially reasonable decisions. | ||
Because common law combined custom and reason, special
training was needed to understand its logic or maxims, what Coke
called "artificial reason".
|
.
Common law was held to be "immemorial." In the case of particular laws and customs, proving that it existed in 1189 was sufficient to establish that it had existed for time out of mind. But the idea of "immemoriality" was often much looser and vaguer. |
|
It was possible to use some of the key concepts of
common law thinking to support determined royal action. Sir John
Davies and Chief Baron Fleming, for example, held that custom gave the
king the power to levy taxes without consent when this was necessary
for the public good.
|
||
|
Often, however, common law thinking was deployed to limit royal power - and particularly to protect property and individual rights. The most central contention was that common law protected the freedom of English people from laws and taxes to which they had not consented. | ||
|
Common lawyers were in some ways very conservative -
they wished to enforce customary limitations on royal power, not to
invent new ones, and certainly not actively to resist the monarch. |

Assize Judge
|
One of the greatest concerns of common law thought was to protect individual property rights against government. Many common lawyers also insisted on other individual rights - such as freedom from arbitrary arrest, when Charles I undermined habeas corpus in 1626-7. | |
|
In their stress on individual rights, common law theorists differed from other political thinkers (most of whom subordinated individual rights to the public) good. Common law theorists, in contrast, saw the public good as lying in the maintenance of individual property and liberty: no state would prosper if its citizens (like bondsmen or villeins) could have their property arbitrarily seized. | |
|
Common law theory forms one of the most important foundations of modern liberalism, because of its stress on individual rights and on the limitations of state power. It also contributed to conservative thought, because of its respect for custom and property and suspicion of radical "reforms" and social engineering. | |
Common law thinking was largely based on specifically English customs. Common lawyers often stressed that the rights which they discussed were those of "free-born Englishmen" - not of French peasants, nor of Eastern despots' slaves. Yet they sometimes implied that all nations would do well to imitate English practice, and that if they did so people everywhere would be able to eat good roast beef and wear leather shoes - rather than wooden clogs. | |
|
Despite these universalizing tendencies, in order to be truly worldwide in its application social and political theory had to look beyond English common law to universal human nature; John Locke gave universal reasons in favor of many of the claims of the common lawyers. |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|