Grotius,
Pufendorf and the Modern Theory of Natural Law
Suggested reading
Brett, Annabel S,
Liberty, Right and Nature. Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought,
Cambridge 1997
[Valuable study of pre-Grotian theories]
Bull, Hedley, Kingsbury, Benedict, and Roberts, Adam, eds. (1990), Hugo
Grotius and International
Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990
[Useful collection of essays;
some specific items are listed below].
Chappell, Vere, Grotius to Gassendi, New York 1992.
Draper, G. I. A. D. (1990), 'Grotius' place in the development of legal
ideas about war', in Hedley Bull,
Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts, Adam, eds., Hugo Grotius and
International
Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990, 177-207,
Edwards, Charles S., Hugo
Grotius, the miracle of Holland : a study in political and legal
thought, Chicago 1981
[Straightforward introduction, stressing
continuity rather than change in Grotius' theories]
Gelderen, Martin Van, "From Domingo de Soto to Grotius:
Theories of monarchy and civil power in Dutch political thought 1558-1598", Il pensiero politico, 19 (1986) pp. 163-81.
Haakonsen, Knud, "Hugo Grotius and the history of political thought,"
in Political Theory 13(1985), 239-65.
Haakonsen, Knud, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy from Grotius to
the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
1996.
[Sees Grotius and Pufendorf as beginning a new school.]
Haggenmacher, Peter (1990), 'Grotius and Gentili', in
Hedley Bull, Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts, eds., Hugo Grotius and International Relations,
133-76.
Keene, Edward, Beyond the anarchical society : Grotius,
colonialism and order in world politics, Cambridge University Press
2002.
St Leger, J. (1962), The "Etiamsi daremus" of Hugo Grotius, Rome 1962
[Stresses continuity with earlier, Catholic thinking.]
Scott, Jonathan, "The Law of war: Grotius, Sidney, Locke and
the political theory of rebellion" in Simon Groenveld and Michael Wintle (eds) Britain and the Netherlands, vol. XI The Exchange of Ideas,
pp.115-32.
Sommerville, Johann P., "Selden, Grotius, and the
Seventeenth-Century Intellectual Revolution in Moral and Political Theory," in
Victoria Kahn and Lorna Hutson, eds., Rhetoric and Law in Early Modern Europe,
New Haven, Yale University Press, 2001, 318-44
[Expresses doubts about the
"modernist" thesis on natural law.]
Tierney, Brian, The idea of natural rights : studies on
natural rights, natural law, and church law, 1150-1625, Grand Rapids 1997
[Fundamental study]
Tuck, Richard, 'The "modern" theory of natural law', in Anthony Pagden,
ed., The languages of political theory in early-modern Europe,
Cambridge 1987.
[Excellent statement of the "modernist" thesis -- see also Tuck's
Philosophy and Government]
Tuck, Richard, Natural Rights Theories, Cambridge 1979
Tuck, Richard, "Grotius and Selden" in J.
H. Burns, ed., with the assistance of Mark Goldie, The Cambridge History
of Political Thought 1450-1700, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
1991, pp.499-529
|
Questions
|
| Did Hugo Grotius develop a
novel theory of natural rights?
How "minimalist" are Grotius' political and
moral assumptions?
Compare and contrast Grotius and Vitoria.
Was Grotius an absolutist? In what ways did
his theories differ from those of the monarchomachs?
|
|
|
|
Suggested reading
(some items on the Vitoria and Hobbes lists are also relevant)
Behme, Thomas, "Pufendorf's Doctrine of Sovereignty and its Natural Law
Foundations," in Ian Hunter and David Saunders, eds., Natural Law and Civil
Sovereignty, Palgrave Macmillan 2002, 43-58.
D'Entrèves, Natural Law. An introduction to legal philosophy.
With a new introduction by Cary
J. Nederman, (New Brunswick and London, Transaction
Publishers, 1994; originally published in 1951);
[An old classic.]
Dufour, Alfred, "Pufendorf'," in J. H. Burns, ed., The Cambridge
history of political thought, 1450-1700, edited by J.H. Burns with
the assistance of Mark Goldie.
Hunter, Ian, "The love of a sage or the
command of a superior : the natural law doctrines of Leibniz and Pufendorf" in Early modern natural
law theories : contexts and strategies in the early Enlightenment,
edited by T.J. Hochstrasser and P.Schröder, Dordrecht 2003.
Hont, Istvan, 'The language of sociability and commerce: Samuel
Pufendorf and the theoretical foundations of the "four stages"
theory', in Anthony Pagden, ed., The languages of political theory
in early-modern Europe, Cambridge 1987.
Korkman, Petter, " Voluntarism and moral obligation : Barbeyrac’s defence of
Pufendorf revisited" in Early modern natural
law theories : contexts and strategies in the early Enlightenment,
edited by T.J. Hochstrasser and P. Schröder, Dordrecht 2003
Korkman, Petter,"Civil
Sovereigns and the King of Kings: Barbeyrac on the Creator’s Right to Rule" in
Ian Hunter and David Saunders, eds.,
Natural Law and Civil
Sovereignty, Palgrave Macmillan 2002, 109-122.
Krieger, Leonard, The politics of discretion: Pufendorf and the
acceptance of natural law, Chicago 1965
Krieger, Leonard, "History and law in the seventeenth century: Pufendorf," in Journal of the History of Ideas,
21(1960),190-210
Schneewind, J.B., "Pufendorf's place in the history of ethics," in
Synthese, 72(1987), 123-55.
Van Gelderen, Martin, "From Domingo de Soto to Hugo Grotius, Theories
of monarchy and civil power in Spanish and Dutch political thought" in Il pensiero politico 32 (1999) pp.186-205
|
Questions |
|
Is Pufendorf a representative of the "modern"
theory of natural law?
What was that theory?
How does Pufendorf differ from Vitoria?
What were Pufendorf's political (as opposed
to his purely moral) doctrines, and how do they link to
historical developments in his time?
Compare Pufendorf with some of the earlier
theorists we have looked at - especially Hobbes, the
monarchomachs and the Levellers. |

|